· Glossary of Research Terms Acculturation -- refers to the process of adapting to another culture, particularly in reference to blending in with the Accuracy -- a term used in survey research to refer to the match between the target population and the sample. Affective Measures -- procedures or Cited by: 1 Identifying Key Search Terms in a Research Question Imagine you have been asked to write a paper that answers the question: How can you motivate employees during times of organizational change? Search tools would not do a good job interpretting that question as written here; you would need to break it down into searchable keywords and phrases · What are key terms in a research paper? Keywords are important words/concepts found in your research question or thesis. A quick and dirty way to pull keywords from a research question/thesis is to choose the most important nouns; all other words are irrelevant. Using keywords to search will always retrieve more results than phrases or sentences
Identifying Key Search Terms in a Research Question | RRU Library
Knowing and understanding terms and concepts related to academic writing, and being able to apply them, will help you organize your thoughts and ultimately produce a better essay or paper. Academic argument is constructed to make a point, not to "argue" heatedly using emotion. The characteristics of academic argument include language that is. The concept is simple: You state your point and back it up. But the backing-it-up part is trickier, because so many things can go awry between point and backup.
Thus, the relationship between assertion and proof involves these:. There have been some studies done on the use of scents, especially in Japan, and their effect on workplace actions, workers' emotions, and productivity. It's likely that you will be able to find information on this in scientific or business journals that are written for professionals in those fields.
So this actually might be provable by academic argument. It's hard to determine whether the first example, "X is better than Y," is provable, as it's not specific enough an assertion.
You'd need to define X and Y precisely, and you'd need to define the term "better" precisely in order even to approach having a provable argument. For example, the assertion "Learning through doing is more akin to the way most adults learn than learning through classroom lectures," is probably provable with evidence from psychologists, educators, and learning theorists. The point here is that an argument needs to be precise to be provable. The last example, "UFOs are really government-regulated," may not be provable.
Even if you define UFO and government, it may be impossible to find evidence to prove this assertion. Again, the point is that you won't have an argument if you don't have an assertion that can be proved.
Many students assume, incorrectly, that the more facts, the better support for an argument; and they key terms in a research paper to load the support with dates or numbers. But the opinions of experts in the field are just as important as facts in constituting proof for an argument. Expert opinion means that a professional, well-versed in a field, has interpreted and drawn conclusions from facts. In writing--or in analyzing--an argument, you need to ask whether the assertion has appropriate proof in terms of type and quantity.
It's not enough to argue that adults learn better by doing than by listening to lectures, and to use the experience of one adult learner to validate your argument.
You'd need more than one person's experience, and you'd need both facts generally accepted psychological and physiological observations about the way we learn and expert opinion studies done that confirm the facts.
The assertion and the proof need to relate to one another logically to have create a solid, acceptable argument. Problems commonly occur in the relationship when there are incorrect assumptions underlying the assertion, or incorrect conclusions drawn on the basis of inappropriate or insufficient proof.
In general, the assertion and any assumptions underlying the assertion need to be generally acceptable, while the proof needs to be sufficient, relevant to the assertion and free of incorrect assumptions and conclusions. A good accessible text that examines the relationship between an assertion and proof the nature of argument is Annette Rottenberg's "Elements of Argument," which uses Stephen Toulmin's classic "The Uses of Argument" as its basis.
She explores the relationship among these pieces of argument within the context of writing good arguments. Another good text is Marlys Mayfield's "Thinking for Yourself," which has particularly useful chapters on facts, opinions, assumptions, and inferences, key terms in a research paper.
Still another good text is Vincent Ruggerio's "The Art of Thinking" which looks at both critical and creative thought. Argument exists not only in ideas but also in the way those ideas are presented through language. Your instructor may mean "compare and contrast" when he or she tells you key terms in a research paper "compare. Try to find interesting and unexpected similarities and differences. That's what your instructor is hoping for--ideas he or she hasn't thought of yet.
You are expected to be able to answer the question: What is the exact meaning of this word, term, expression according to a school of thought, culture, text, individual within the argument?
Generally, your definition is expected to conform to other people's understanding of how the term is used within a specific discipline or area of study. Your definition must distinguish the term you are defining from all other things. For example, although it is true that an orange is a fruit, it is not a sufficient key terms in a research paper of an orange.
Lemons are fruits too. A clear definition of a term enables a reader to tell whether any event or thing they might encounter falls into the category designated.
Tip : A definition is never "true"; it is always controversial, and depends on who's proposing it. Usually you are expected to give a clear, detailed picture of something in a description.
If this instruction is vague, ask questions so you know what level of specificity is expected in your description. Ordinarily you are expected to consider all sides of a question with a fairly open mind rather than taking a firm position and arguing it, key terms in a research paper. Because "discuss" is a broad term, it's a good idea to clarify with your professor.
You are expected to answer the question: What is the value, truth or quality of this essay, key terms in a research paper, book, movie, argument, and so forth? Ordinarily, you are expected to consider how well something meets a certain standard. To critique a book, key terms in a research paper, you might measure it against some literary or social value.
You might evaluate a business presentation on the basis of the results you predict it will get. Often you will critique parts of the whole, using a variety of criteria; for example, in critiquing another student's paper, you might consider: Where is it clear? not clear? What was interesting? Do the examples add to the paper? Is the conclusion a good one? If there are no established criteria, make sure you have carefully developed your own, and persuade the reader that you are right in your evaluation by clarifying your criteria and explaining carefully how the text or parts of the text in question measure up to them.
You are expected to answer the question: What is the meaning or the significance of this text or key terms in a research paper, as I understand it? You might be asked to interpret a poem, a slide on the stock market, a political event, or evidence from an experiment. You are not being asked for just any possible interpretation. You are being asked for your best interpretation. So even though it is a matter of opinion, ordinarily you are expected to explain why you think as you do.
You are expected to go beyond summarizing, interpreting, and evaluating the text. You attach meaning that is not explicitly stated in the text by bringing your own experiences and prior knowledge into the reading of the text.
This kind of writing allows you to develop your understanding of what you read within the context of your own life and thinking and feeling. It facilitates a real conversation between you and the text. A good summary shows your instructor that you understand what you have read and actually clarifies it for yourself, key terms in a research paper. Tip: Summary and summary-reaction papers are commonly assigned at Empire State College. Read more at Writing Summaries and Paraphrases.
Key Terms in Academic Writing--Online Writing Center Knowing and understanding terms and concepts related to academic writing, and being able to apply them, will help you organize your thoughts and ultimately produce a better essay or paper. Argue Academic argument is constructed to make a point, not to "argue" heatedly using emotion.
The characteristics of academic argument include language that is impersonal no personal references logical evidence-based examples The purposes of academic argument are to analyze an issue or a situation make a case for your point of view convince your reader or listener of the truth of something.
A convincing academic argument has two elements: Assertion your argument, what you are trying to provesuch as X is better than Y. Scents in the office can affect people's work. UFOs are really government-regulated. In written argument, the argument usually is crystallized in an essay's thesis sentence.
Key terms in a research paper evidence to show the truth of the argument The concept is simple: You state your point and back it up. Thus, key terms in a research paper, the relationship between assertion and proof involves these: There are different types of assertions; you need to choose one that can be proven logically. There are many ways to influence the argument through language; you need to choose language that is dispassionate and unbiased so that you're focusing your proof key terms in a research paper evidence instead of emotion.
What to Consider in Writing an Academic Argument The Argument Itself An argument can be called an assertion a claim a thesis Whatever term you choose, it needs to be proven.
Three examples of assertions: X is better than Y. UFO's are really government-regulated. Types of Proof Proof generally falls into two categories: facts and opinions. A "fact" is something that has been demonstrated or verified as true or something that is generally accepted as truth. For example, it's a fact that the world is round. It's my opinion that Frick and Frack argue too much.
Relationship Between Argument and Proof The assertion and the proof need to relate to one another logically to have create a solid, acceptable argument. For examples: You can't logically argue that adult students don't like lectures on the basis of interviews with one or two adult students.
You can't assume that because this situation is true for one or two adult learners, it's true for all. You can't logically argue that our weather has changed on earth because of our forays into outer space.
You can't conclude that one action has been the sole cause of another action. You can't logically argue that we have to be either for or against a proposition. You can't assume that only those two responses exist. Rottenberg breaks argument down into claim the argument itself grounds the proof warrant the underlying assumptions She explores the relationship among these pieces of argument within the context of writing good arguments. The Role of Language in Argument Language style and use are crucially important to argument.
Has an attempt been made to use straightforward language, key terms in a research paper, or is the language emotionally-charged? Has an attempt been made to argue through reliance on evidence, or does the argument rely on swaying your thoughts through word choice and connotation?
Is the language precise or vague? Is the language concrete or abstract? Contrast ordinarily answers the question: What are the ways in which they are different? Define You are expected to be able to answer the question: What is the exact meaning of this word, term, expression according to a school of thought, culture, text, key terms in a research paper within the argument?
Examples may clarify, but do not define, a word, term, or expression.
Research Writing Process: Key Terms and Concepts
, time: 3:06How to Choose Keywords for Your Research Paper | Wordvice
How to Write Definitions of Terms in a Research Paper: Useful Example In order to come up with a definition of terms, the student must identify his interest areas. The student may start by examining his childhood and the way he was brought out to search for significant events that may have had a strong influence on him in the formative years Key Terms in Academic Writing--Online Writing Center. Knowing and understanding terms and concepts related to academic writing, and being able to apply them, will help you organize your thoughts and ultimately produce a better essay or paper · Glossary of Research Terms Acculturation -- refers to the process of adapting to another culture, particularly in reference to blending in with the Accuracy -- a term used in survey research to refer to the match between the target population and the sample. Affective Measures -- procedures or Cited by: 1
No comments:
Post a Comment